Rep. Jeff Miller Newsletter - October 6, 2008

 

I recently voted against the second Wall Street bailout bill. House and Senate Democrats responded to Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson’s request for unlimited control of 700 billion dollars of your money by adding nearly 200 billion dollars in “sweeteners” in order to get more votes for the bailout the second time around.

My vote is not for sale, and although the updated bill was better than the original bill I voted against, it didn’t get me to change my original vote against it. Raising the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s (FDIC) limit for bank-insured deposits from 100,000 dollars to 250,000 dollars and improving mark-to-market accounting standards is a good start but does not go far enough.

The bill could have done more to stabilize the markets by requiring the Treasury Department to guarantee up to 100% of losses resulting from the failure of timely payment and interest from mortgage-backed securities (MBS) that originated prior to the bill's enactment. Such insurance would provide immediate value to the MBS and a foundation by which they could then be sold.

In order to finance this insurance, the Treasury Department could also assess a premium on outstanding MBS. Participation in the program would be mandatory for all holders of such MBS in order to guard against adverse selection where only the holders of troubled assets participate. A risk-based premium would be assessed on those with troubled MBS. The premium would expire when the Treasury Secretary determines the fund has sufficient resources to meet any projected losses.

Another needed action is an injection of private capital into the market, and this would be more likely to happen with a temporary elimination of capital gains taxes. That action, along with a reduction in our corporate income tax rates, would provide stability through investment and business growth. However, this legislation fundamentally changes the relationship between the government and the free market and burdens the taxpayer with a $700 billion price tag. Although I opposed this bill on a philosophical and principled level, I do hope our financial system improves and does so quickly.

Again, thank you for contacting me about this important issue. If you would like to receive further information on issues of importance to you, please log on to my website at http://jeffmiller.house.gov/. As always, please feel free to contact my office if you have any further concerns.

Rep. Jeff Miller Newsletter- September 29, 2008

 

Almost two weeks ago the Secretary of the Treasury, Henry Paulson, sent a three page request to the Congress asking for 700 billion dollars of your money for his friends and former colleagues on Wall Street.  The former Chairman of the investment bank, Goldman Sachs, also asked the Congress to pass a law ensuring his actions “are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency.” 

The Founders of this country set up an ingenious system of government to ensure power was not disproportionately given to one individual.  The goal was to avoid tyranny at all costs.  Secretary Paulson most likely skipped that class in college and was hoping you had as well.  Many wonder how such a poorly structured piece of legislation could even come about in the first place.  I wonder how the President approved this as well.

By demanding this bailout money, the Administration attempted to circumvent the legislative process.  Moreover, the Administration continues to insist that their way is the only way to avoid an imminent crisis. 

Perhaps most stunning, is that the Administration officials responsible for protecting American taxpayers and our free market system were asleep at the switch.  Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Chris Cox recently admitted his culpability in this matter and amazingly, the Secretary of the Treasury recently admitted he had seen this crisis coming for nearly a year and just now came to the Congress.

Such large-scale government interference in our markets ensures the correction process will take much longer than it would have otherwise.  What would help toward long-term stability is an injection of private capital into economy.  We need to establish and maintain low tax rates on capital gains and corporate income, allowing people to invest more of their money and relieving American companies from one of the highest corporate tax rates in the world.

 

The Democrats did not care to address the corporate tax rate issue and in fact, their response to the Administration’s bailout plan was just as bad, if not worse.  They attempted to allow unions to take over corporate boards of failed companies, let judges rewrite the terms of your mortgage and even set up a slush fund for housing groups that among other things, register Democratic voters.  Nowhere did they address one of the fundamental issues that got us into this mess, the implicit government backing of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. 

 

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac need to be changed into purely private companies, not government sponsored enterprises with special privileges.  They need to pay taxes like everyone else and until they are purely private, they must be prohibited from spending taxpayer money on lobbying the government to ensure their continued existence, despite their failed management and banking practices.

An overwhelming majority of constituents have called, emailed, and written into my office stating their outright opposition to any sort of bailout for corporations that were reckless and irresponsible with their management.  Moreover, responsible people who live within their means should not be bearing the burden of bailing out corporations.  The American taxpayer deserves better.  We must not sacrifice long term freedom for short term financial gain.

 

*********************

 

 

Rep. Jeff Miller Message - September 19, 2008

 

On September 17th, my colleague Representative Jim Moran and I introduced bipartisan House Resolution 6930, the “Military Family Autism Equality Act” to the 110th Congress.  This bill provides retired military families with autistic children the same health care benefit afforded families of active duty service members.  TRICARE medical coverage for autistic children of military retirees is long overdue and I’m pleased Congressman Moran and I were able to address this issue together.  Autism is an insidious disorder inflicted upon our children and we should live up to our obligation to serve the children of those who have served our nation.

This truly is an example of how one concerned citizen can in fact make a difference.  A constituent from the 1st District called my office and let us know that, in 2007, her 2-year-old son was diagnosed with severe autism.  Only months earlier, her husband retired as a Master Sergeant from the Air Force.  Due to her husband’s change of status from active duty to retired, her family was no longer eligible for Applied Behavioral Analysis (ABA) coverage under the Extended Care Health Option (ECHO) program.  Active duty service members with an autistic child have access to this benefit through TRICARE and it provides up to $2,500 per month for ABA therapy, a proven and medically necessary treatment for the symptoms of autism.  

When my constituent’s concern was brought to my attention, I was deeply disappointed to find that retirees with autistic dependents were not getting coverage they deserved.  It is not right for a military family member to be covered under the ECHO program one day, then be dropped the next, simply because a soldier, sailor, airman, or marine retired from active service. 

The Department of Defense estimates there are nearly 8,800 retirees with dependents diagnosed with autism or a related disorder.  This legislation will help these families and we will not stop there.  We will continue to make sure that these families get the help and assistance they need.  We also have more work to do for active duty personnel and their families.

I was elected to represent the citizens of Northwest Florida and do everything I can to ensure their voices are heard in Washington.  This is a great example of one of those citizens cutting through the red tape and giving me advice on how to make the federal bureaucracy work

I would like to thank the many advocacy groups who have already provided their support to our bill, namely Autism Speaks, the Autism Society of America, the Military Officers Association of America, and Talk About Curing Autism.  I look forward to getting the Military Family Autism Equality Act passed so that our military retirees battling autism will not have to bear the significant financial burden that comes with their continued fight.  They have already paid a significant price with honorable service and sacrifice to their country and this is a major thank you note from a grateful nation to these families.

 

*********************

 

Rep. Jeff Miller Press Release - September 18, 2008

 

MILLER OFFERS BILL TO PREVENT MILITARY FAMILIES FROM LOSING HEALTH CARE BENEFITS FOR AUTISTIC CHILDREN AT RETIREMENT

 

Washington, DC (September 18, 2008) - Washington, D.C.,– Congressman Jim Moran (D-VA) and Congressman Jeff Miller (R-FL) introduced legislation today, the “Military Family Autism Equality Act,” which provides retired military families with autistic children the same health care benefit as families of active duty service members with children suffering from autism.

“This bipartisan bill to extend needed medical coverage for children of military retirees with autism is long overdue, and I’m pleased Congressman Moran and I were able to address this issue together,” stated Rep. Jeff Miller. Autism is an insidious disorder inflicted upon our children, and we should live up to our obligation to serve the children of those who have served our nation.”

“Caring for an autistic child is expensive,” said Rep. Jim Moran. Military families already stretched thin by the high costs associated with the disease and long deployments overseas are often left with a choice no parent wants to face: provide expensive treatments for their child or keep their family clothed and fed. The ‘Military Family Autism Equality Act’ would eliminate that painful decision, making autism care available for all military families, active or retired.”

Active duty service members with an autistic child have access to a benefit through TRICARE that provides $2500 a month (a max of $30,000/year) for Applied Behavioral Analysis (ABA), a proven treatment for the symptoms of Autism. Unfortunately, the day an active duty soldier retires from the military, their dependents lose access to the ABA health benefit. This occurs whether the retirement is voluntary or a forced retirement at the end of their career obligations.

The Moran-Miller bipartisan “Military Family Autism Equality Act” would extend this autism benefit to all military families, whether active or retired.

With the Department of Defense estimating 8,784 retirees with dependents diagnosed with autism or an autism spectral disorder (ASD), its clear this is a serious issue facing a growing number of our veterans and their families.

According to a February 2007 study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, one in 150 children under the age of eight have autism or an ASD such as Asperger syndrome, Rett syndrome, childhood disintegrative disorder, and pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified.

“All those affected by autism should be able to receive appropriate, medically necessary care,” said Lee Grossman, ASA President and CEO. “The Autism Society of America strongly supports this legislation, which would provide quality care to families that have made tremendous sacrifices for our country.”

The cost savings from autism treatment are clear. A Harvard School of Public Health report found that without effective intervention, approximately 90% of individuals with ASD require lifelong care costing an estimated $3.2 million over a child’s lifetime. ABA therapy has been shown to be effective in reducing this figure to less than 50% and reducing the costs of lifelong care by two-thirds.

 

 

*********************

 

Rep. Jeff Miller Newsletter - September 15, 2008

 

On July 11 of this year, a barrel of crude oil was being traded for an all-time record high of $147. 27.  On July 25th, Nancy Pelosi of San Francisco kicked off her book tour.  On August 1st the Democratic majority skipped town to peddle their tax and spend, “do nothing” agenda throughout the United States.  As Speaker Pelosi officially jet setted across the country, closely monitoring her book sales, Republicans were back in Washington closely monitoring the price of gas and we are happy to report that at press time today, a barrel of crude oil is $97, a seven month low. 

 

With just two weeks left until congress adjourns, last week’s floor schedule was packed with non-binding resolutions and other non-essential bills. At a time when Americans desperately need relief from the high price of gasoline, we should be deliberating energy policy, not passing resolutions recognizing a world hunger problem or spending nearly four hours debating the importance of a stream in Vermont.  As the110th Congress draws to a close, the majority has passed only one appropriations bill and put forth no meaningful energy legislation.

My Republican colleagues and I have meaningful energy legislation that is ready now. The solution to America’s energy problems is House Resolution 6566, the American Energy Act. This “all of the above” energy bill would increase domestic energy supplies, advance efficiency as well as renewable and alternative energy, and promote conservation. The bill would create an innovative environment that promotes new energy technology. Additionally, the bill addresses Americans’ demands to explore American natural resources.

 

The American people know the Democrats control Congress and they know Democrats are doing nothing about our energy problems.  It’s time to hold the leadership of this Congress accountable and demand they bring our “all of the above” bill to the floor for a vote.  Any bills that include hidden tax increases and wasteful spending in the form of subsidies for liberal special interests should be voted against. 

 

The time for politics is over my friends- we must act now!  Please call Nancy Pelosi at 202-225-4965 and demand a vote on HR 6566!

 

 

 

 

 

 

Backhome elephant